About me
Born |
Edward Osborne Wilson |
---|---|
Nationality |
American |
Fields |
Biologist |
Institutions |
Harvard University |
Alma mater |
University of Alabama |
Thesis |
A Monographic Revision of the Ant Genus Lasius (1955) |
Doctoral advisor |
Frank M. Carpenter |
Doctoral students |
Daniel Simberloff |
Known for |
Popularizing sociobiology |
Notable awards |
Newcomb Cleveland Prize (1967) |
Edward Osborne "E. O." Wilson (born June 10, 1929) is an American biologist, researcher (sociobiology,biodiversity), theorist (consilience, biophilia), naturalist (conservationist) and author. His biological specialty ismyrmecology, the study of ants, on which he is considered to be the world's leading authority.
Wilson experienced significant criticism for his sociobiological views from several different communities. The scientific response included several of Wilson's colleagues at Harvard, such as Richard Lewontin and Stephen Jay Gould, who were strongly opposed to his ideas regarding sociobiology. Marshall Sahlins's work The Use and Abuse of Biology was a direct criticism of Wilson's theories.
Politically, Wilson's sociobiological ideas have been opposed by some Marxists, who maintain that human behavior is culturally based. Sociobiology re-ignited the nature and nurture debate, and Wilson's scientific perspective on human nature led to public debate. He was accused of "racism, misogyny, and eugenics." In one incident, his lecture was attacked by the International Committee Against Racism, a front group of the Progressive Labor Party, where one member poured a pitcher of water on Wilson's head and chanted "Wilson, you're all wet" at an AAAS conference in November 1978. Wilson later spoke of the incident as a source of pride: "I believe...I was the only scientist in modern times to be physically attacked for an idea."
“I believe Gould was a charlatan,” Wilson told The Atlantic. “I believe that he was ... seeking reputation and credibility as a scientist and writer, and he did it consistently by distorting what other scientists were saying and devising arguments based upon that distortion.”